Question:
Why Do we have to pay Licence Fees for TV ?
Billy
2012-03-20 02:36:02 UTC
The BRITISH TV Licence fee goes to THE BBC because there are no adverts to pay for the programmes HOWEVER some BBC TV Programmes carry sponsorship but with Television BBC TV & Radio ONLY receive the money from the Licence , ITV Programmes , Channel 4 & 5 stations and Sky or Virgin don't receive any money from The TV Licence Fee .

Likewise Establishments are charged Licence Fees to play Music , To get Married You Need a Licence , To Fish you need a Licence , To be a Radio Ham or use CB Tranceivers you need a Licence , To drive a vehicle you need a Licence , to Fly you need a Licence . BUT WHY ?
Twelve answers:
guiri
2012-03-20 04:11:30 UTC
To keep hundreds of public sectors in work doing a totally unnecessary job.



There is absolutely no reason for TV licencing to exist in the 21st century other to create employment for non-productive people who would be unlikely to get jobs elsewhere.



Even to a fool like me, it is obvious that almost everyone has a TV. Thus the BBC should be funded (before it is denationalised) from taxation thus saving millions in salaries and court and legal costs.



Denationalisation would also bring even greater savings.



It is an anachronism in the 20th Century.





P.S It is NOT true that the BBC does not run adverts. e.g. BBC internet and BBC world both run adverts. Product placement is suspected but no action has been taken. (e.g. 'The North Face')
anonymous
2012-03-20 02:49:28 UTC
Which BBC programmes carry sponsorship.





The Licence fee idea was introduced in the 1920s and has remained.





The BBC sells programmes abroad (Top Gear and such) which raises revenue for the BBC, otherwise the BBC only receives money through the Licence fee.



It is illegal to play music covered by copyright and not pay that copyright. You can buy a licence from the PRS this prevents you breaking that copyright law.



The BBC also pays PRS (performing rights society) for any music played on any of its programmes.



Radio Ham licences were there so that the airwaves were not inundated with broadcasts that caused interference to other broadcasters, and also because the Governments of the World realised they could be used for propaganda.



You need a licence to drive to show competence and safety of other road users. There were more road deaths in 1935 than today, despite the fact few people could drive.



Likewise flying.



The fishing licences are there so that they help for the upkeep of the rivers.

Licence to get married came about to regularise the system for legal reasons of when some one dies, as to who inherits any money or property.
anonymous
2016-05-17 10:20:02 UTC
Probably not but I like the idea that you could charge everyone in a prison for a t.v. license firstly you have a captive audience (literally) and when you take the forty quid or is it more these days from as many as 800 inmates you could finally get some decent programming on the B.B.C.
Janian
2012-03-20 04:20:15 UTC
Well you can pay your license fee and continue to watch the BBC news channels, or you can follow the USA. Where corporations run their news channels and they get highly irregular, biased news.



Go to the USA and watch their 'news' then you will be glad we have the BBC.
anonymous
2012-03-20 02:55:47 UTC
Change the word "fee" to "TAX" and you have your answer. The only advantage is the BBC radio and TV must show/play programmes for all sections of society and for all interests. For example - I like Boxing and others like Antiques etc.
Biftatheskunk
2012-03-20 05:11:51 UTC
The TV license was originally introduced to help set up a TV network.The BBC did not just come into existence one day and find itself full of investment.Cameras, Ariel's, Studios etc all had to be built and paid for.



When the BBC was first established it was a far far different world than today.There really was no alternative way of funding it as things like advertising was unheard of back then.



Personally i watch very very little on the BBC.The only programs that i view are Question time and my drama queen wife watches east enders.Now that means that each program costs me around £80 per year to watch. My viewing of the BBC is around 3 hours a week.Multiply that by the amount of weeks per years and my total viewing is around 150 hours per year which means the BBC costs me around £1 per hour.When looking at it this way it does not appear to be expensive.When compared with the cinema or dvd's it works out cheaper per hour.



However i have sky tv at home which costs me around £40 per month.My sky viewing is around 15 hours per week.This means i watch sky around 60 hours per month so it costs me more money per year than the BBC but gives me better value at around 75p per hour.



When looking at these figures it would appear that the BBC is not expensive but it gives me less value for money than sky.



My main gripe with the TV license is that i do not have a choice if i want to receive the BBC or not.It is dictated to me that i must pay for the BBC if i want to watch any television channel.



Since digital television has been launched companies that provide television have the ability to turn channels off and on at the click of a button.I therefore think i should have a choice.If i decide that i don't want to watch the BBC i should have the choice of not having to pay for it.



I do think that the BBc should be forced to advertise for a few reasons.



1 Over recent years the BBC has been showing less and less sport.We have seen things like football, formula one, boxing, cricket all emigrate to sky.The BBC can't compete with companies like sky at their present levels of funding.



2 I view it as being very very wrong to dictate to a customer than he or she has to have and pay for the BBC.The customer should be given the choice.It should not be forced on them just because they have a television that can pick up that particular channel.



3 i have never used radio 2, 3 or 4.I have never used the world service.Yet a portion of my tv license goes to fund these.I never had a say in this.I was never asked if i would like the BBC to set these services up or not.I have never been asked if i would like these services to continue.Now didn't get me wrong i do understand that the BBC needs to try and cater for all tastes.However i don't understand why it needs to broadcast to foreign countries when we no longer have an empire.I understand even less when British people are paying for the BBC to be broadcast to foreigners and those foreigners get that service for free.The only logical reason i see for this is it aids the government in spreading their rhetoric(oppose sorry i meant propaganda)



Channels like ITV, C4 etc seem to make a very good living from advertising.They appear to compete well with the BBC as the viewing figures have shown over the years.Now i personally can't stand advertising.To have to sit and watch 5 Min's of adverts evey 15 Min's or so drives me crazy.So the question i need to ask myself is would advertising on the BBC impinge on my life.The conclusion i come up with is that i just don't watch the BBC enough for it the adverts to have any effect on me.This is even easier to avoid with digital boxes for recording television.I simply fast forward past the adverts



Therefore in my opinion i would like to see the TV license abolished and the BBC privatised.



I truly find it odd that we live in a so called Democracy but that Democracy does not give me the right to choose if i want to receive the BBC or not



The other licenses you have mentioned are fairly self explanatory.



Driving and flying licenses are about safety.



Fishing license is about fish stocks.



Marriage license is about the administration costs involved in becoming married.Tax, name change etc.
anonymous
2012-03-20 03:17:12 UTC
We have to pay for this since people need to make money in order to buy lifetime supplies of iced donuts and cake and ice cream.
?
2012-03-20 02:38:59 UTC
Its all a big money making scam! Not to mention it is not technically legal under EU laws. There is no opt out clause, so you are forced to take a subscription based service if you want it or not.
hulk h
2012-03-22 01:30:22 UTC
not going to be the best answer, but it is the law
xpatinasia
2012-03-20 03:09:17 UTC
You answered your own question.
?
2012-03-20 03:55:40 UTC
To fund the labour party's election machine
jjn333
2012-03-20 02:40:20 UTC
To make money -!!!!!


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...